Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 24;2(2):e000114. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000114

Table 5.

Relative Risk (95% CI) of CHD by Quartile (Q) of Plasma Magnesium

Plasma Magnesium
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P–Linear Trend* RR Comparing ≥2.1 With <2.1 mg/dL
Range of magnesium, mg/dL ≤2.0 2.1 to 2.1 2.2 to 2.3 ≥2.4
Cases 98 55 204 101
Controls 66 70 201 121
Model 1* 1.0 (ref) 0.51 (0.31 to 0.82) 0.65 (0.44 to 0.96) 0.54 (0.35 to 0.82) 0.04 0.59 (0.41 to 0.85)
Model 2* 1.0 (ref) 0.51 (0.30 to 0.85) 0.73 (0.48 to 1.11) 0.61 (0.39 to 0.97) 0.22 0.65 (0.44 to 0.96)
Model 2+magnesium intake 1.0 (ref) 0.50 (0.30 to 0.84) 0.74 (0.49 to 1.12) 0.61 (0.39 to 0.97) 0.23 0.65 (0.44 to 0.96)
Model 2+diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol at baseline 1.0 (ref) 0.47 (0.27 to 0.81) 0.76 (0.48 to 1.20) 0.60 (0.37 to 0.98) 0.30 0.65 (0.42 to 0.99)
Model 2+HDL‐C, LDL‐C, hsCRP, adiponectin, and HbA1c 1.0 (ref) 0.50 (0.28 to 0.88) 0.78 (0.49 to 1.25) 0.63 (0.38 to 1.05) 0.37 0.67 (0.44 to 1.04)

CI indicates confidence interval; CHD, coronary heart disease; RR, relative risk; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; BMI, body mass index; MI, myocardial infarction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

*

Test for linear trend calculated by assigning the median value of magnesium in each quintile and modeling this as a continuous variable in regression models.

*

Model 1: RR estimated from logistic regression models, conditioned on matching factors (age, smoking status, month of blood draw, and fasting status).

*

Model 2: RR further adjusted for BMI, exercise, alcohol intake, family history of MI, eGFR, menopausal therapy, multivitamin use, and intake of omega‐3 fats, polyunsaturated:saturated fat, trans fat, dietary cholesterol, cereal fiber, calcium, potassium, and vitamin D.