Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2008 Mar;11(2):282–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00675.x

Table 4.

Performance on executive function measures by group, controlling for age, verbal ability, and parent education

Task/Variable Language group
F Effect size η2
Bilingual Immersion Control
Composite test scores (z)
EF Composite .46 (.13) −.19 (.08) −.02 (.08) 7.23** .28
Individual tasks
Visually Cued Recall 30.91 (3.40) 17.25 (2.11) 21.67 (2.05) 4.69* .20
Advanced DCCS 3.26 (.35) 2.52 (.22) 2.12 (.21) 3.49* .16
C-TONI 25.38 (1.57) 20.34 (.98) 20.62 (.95) 3.34* .15
Simon Says 9.29 (1.83) 6.94 (1.14) 10.31 (1.11) 2.25 .11
ANT .83 (.07) .72 (.04) .82 (.04) 1.75 .08
KRISP 40.80 (1.20) 39.12 (.75) 38.29 (.72) 1.49 .07
Delay of Gratification 439.02 (65.4) 348.33 (40.6) 416.38 (39.5) 0.91 .05
Statue 12.95 (.97) 13.37 (.60) 12.87 (.59) 0.19 .01
Gift Delay 3.62 (.44) 3.42 (.27) 3.48 (.27) 0.06 .00

Note: Bilingual n = 12; Immersion n = 21; Control n = 17. Means are estimated after controlling for age in months, verbal ability (Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test scores), and parent education levels using ANCOVA.

**

p < .01;

*

p < .05;

p < .10.