Skip to main content
. 2013 May;51(5):1434–1438. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02101-12

Table 2.

Discriminatory power expressed as ID and concordance of SCRA and PFGE compared to epidemiological data

Typing method All isolates (n = 113)
Concordance (%) with epidemiological data on the:
No. of types IDc Strain level (n = 113) Household level (n = 54)
PFGEa 48 0.98 103 (91.2) 49 (90.7)
SCRAb 59 0.99 108 (95.6) 49 (90.7)
a

PFGE of SmaI macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA.

b

SCRA, SpectraCellRA.

c

ID, index of discrimination according to Hunter and Gaston (12).