Skip to main content
. 2013 May;51(5):1593–1595. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00449-13

Table 2.

Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of the two PCR assays, using different approaches for the gold standard definition of B. fragilis infection

Gold standard definition No. (%) of positive patientsa PCR assay Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Positive culture 7 (8.1) RT-PCR 100.0 92.4 53.8 100.0
C-PCR 87.5 93.7 54.5 98.7
Both PCR assays positive 11 (12.8) RT-PCR 100.0 97.3 84.6 100.0
C-PCR 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Positive culture or both PCR assays positive 12 (14.0) RT-PCR 100.0 98.6 92.3 100.0
C-PCR 91.7 100.0 100.0 98.7
Positive culture or any one PCR assay positive 13 (15.1) RT-PCR 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
C-PCR 84.6 100.0 100.0 97.3
Positive culture and any one PCR assay positive 7 (8.1) RT-PCR 100.0 92.4 53.8 100.0
C-PCR 87.5 93.7 54.5 98.7
a

Patients who were considered positive for an infection due to B. fragilis, using the different gold standard definitions.