Table 2.
Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of the two PCR assays, using different approaches for the gold standard definition of B. fragilis infection
Gold standard definition | No. (%) of positive patientsa | PCR assay | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive culture | 7 (8.1) | RT-PCR | 100.0 | 92.4 | 53.8 | 100.0 |
C-PCR | 87.5 | 93.7 | 54.5 | 98.7 | ||
Both PCR assays positive | 11 (12.8) | RT-PCR | 100.0 | 97.3 | 84.6 | 100.0 |
C-PCR | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||
Positive culture or both PCR assays positive | 12 (14.0) | RT-PCR | 100.0 | 98.6 | 92.3 | 100.0 |
C-PCR | 91.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 98.7 | ||
Positive culture or any one PCR assay positive | 13 (15.1) | RT-PCR | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
C-PCR | 84.6 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 97.3 | ||
Positive culture and any one PCR assay positive | 7 (8.1) | RT-PCR | 100.0 | 92.4 | 53.8 | 100.0 |
C-PCR | 87.5 | 93.7 | 54.5 | 98.7 |
Patients who were considered positive for an infection due to B. fragilis, using the different gold standard definitions.