Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Process. 2013 Feb 20;14(2):153–162. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0549-1

Table 1.

Sample coding of two individuals' speech and gesture (one individual from each spatial group). Each sentence was transcribed and coded for the type of information (static vs. dynamic) it conveyed. The location of each gesture was marked by a number in the speech transcript), and each gesture was classified according to type (pointing vs. iconic), referent (static vs. dynamic), and its relationship to speech (same or different information).

Group Speech Speech Coding Gesture Gesture Coding Gesture-Speech Match
Low-spatial Ability I just moved [1 the one on the right] [2 a little bit] to [3 more downward] and they look the same Static: The one on the right
Dynamic: A little bit to more downward
  1. Index finger pointed at the right block

  2. Index finger moved towards left a little bit

  3. Flat hand facing down moved in a downwards motion

  1. Pointing-static

  2. Iconic-dynamic

  3. Iconic-dynamic

  1. Match

  2. Match

  3. Match

High-spatial Ability Flipped [1 the left one] again, [2 rotated it] about 45 degrees, [3] put them together in my head and found that they're the same Static: The left one
Dynamic: Rotated it about 45 degrees
  1. Index finger pointed at the left block

  2. Loose hand facing right moved in semicircle in clockwise

  3. Index finger pointed at the blocks

  1. Pointing-static

  2. Iconic-dynamic

  3. Pointing-static

  1. Match

  2. Match

  3. Mismatch