Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 6;23(5):352–366. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22095

TABLE 1.

Extent of Bilateral Lesion Damage to the LEC and its Subregions

Rat Classification LEC (%) VIE (%) DIE (%) DLE (%) AE (%)
1 Unilateral 21.26 36.24 27.48 8.80 0.00
2 Bilateral 60.53 49.47 83.05 54.48 50.00
3 Bilateral 39.84 66.03 62.93 10.72 6.64
4 Bilateral 13.08 15.48 24.76 5.05 0.00
5 Bilateral 43.80 59.61 57.80 25.42 50.00
6 Unilateral 32.55 33.16 49.20 21.83 50.00
7 Bilateral 48.42 33.50 70.47 44.89 43.64
8 Unilateral 18.09 6.86 31.75 17.23 12.51
9 Bilateral 35.65 18.13 37.44 46.63 0.00
10 Bilateral 40.92 21.15 54.31 44.22 82.36
11 Unilateral 14.46 14.95 21.54 10.39 0.00
12 Bilateral 44.67 20.95 71.33 45.10 0.00
13 Unilateral 17.04 21.02 32.48 4.46 50.00
Average 33.10 30.50 48.04 26.09 26.55

Each number reflects the percentage area of damage relative to the intact area of a sham lesioned rat for each rat classified with a unilateral or bilateral lesion. Average percentages for the LEC lesion group are shown in bold in the bottom row.