Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 6;3(4):583–591. doi: 10.3945/an.111.001230

Table 1.

A summary of research needs ranging from basic science to global policy1

Research need Practical implications Likely time to interventions
Basic science
 Mechanisms of iron–malaria interactions
  Hepatic and/or blood stage effects?
  Acute (e.g., NTBI) and/or chronic (e.g., iron loading) effects?
  Systemic and/or enteric effects? Will inform optimization of iron interventions: chemical composition, dose, timing, fortification vs. supplementation, etc. Short to medium
 Mechanisms of iron interactions with other pathogens
  Malaria-associated bacteremias
  Iron-dependent bacteria (especially TB)
  Iron-dependent viral infections (e.g., HIV, hepatitis C) Will fill extensive knowledge gaps relevant to design of iron-related therapeutic (e.g., iron withholding) and preventive interventions Medium to long
 Hepcidin–iron axis as a mediator of immune responses
  Hepcidin as component of innate immunity
  Hepcidin–iron axis as potential modulator of adaptive 
  immune responses, especially vis-à-vis vaccines Possibility of using hepcidin agonists or antagonists as therapeutic agents and/or vaccine adjuvants Medium to long
 Biology of iron acquisition in an infectious environment
  Is ID and/or anemia partly an adaptive response to 
  infectious threats?
  Are there windows of opportunity for safe iron 
  acquisition between intercurrent infections? Should definitions of ID and anemia cutoffs be modified in infectious environments?
Must infections be reduced before tackling ID? Short to medium
Clinical science and epidemiology
 Risks vs. benefits
  Health metrics research on pros and cons of iron
  interventions
  Further research on iron, brain development, and
  cognition Necessary to balance iron aversion and policy stasis created by Pemba results. Reminder that most interventions (especially vaccines) have risks. Balanced judgment required Short
 Establishing safe modes of iron administration
  Very large-scale trials to test safety of iron in malarial
  regions (theoretical need but not feasible in practice
  to assess serious adverse outcomes and mortality)
  Can only be assessed against nominal proxy outcomes
  such as malarial infection, NTBI, altered microbiota The ethics Catch-22 (see text) will prevent any new trials in high-risk environments without malaria surveillance and control. Small trials can never cancel out Pemba Probably never
 Screening
  Is the Pemba substudy conclusion that iron is safe in
  children with ID secure? Requires replication.
  Is the risk vs. benefit equation dependent on markers of 
  ID?
  Would screening ever be a practical option?
  Screening implies treatment; is this desirable? Good clinical practice recommends assessment and diagnosis of a condition before intervention. Pemba data show this to be critical and WHO adopted a screening resolution, but is it practicable? Short to medium
 Supplements vs. fortifiers vs. foods
  Wide research agenda exists regarding the efficacy and 
  safety of supplements vs. fortifiers
  Iron as part of multinutrient packages for home-based
  fortification (powders or lipid-based pastes) are 
  currently the favored options but still require validation
  Food-based solutions are recognized as difficult to
  achieve at present (but see below) Research in these domains will likely yield the most immediate benefits and help fill the policy/practice void Immediate and onward
 Life-course approaches
  Can a life-course approach (e.g., enhancing iron status 
  of mothers-to-be, cord clamping) reduce the need to
  intervene in infancy? May direct interventions away from pregnancy and young childhood when iron–malaria interactions are most damaging Short
Technological developments
 Formulation of supplements and fortifiers
  Further optimization of chemical composition, dose 
  level, mode of administration, etc.,.
  Controlled slow release in duodenum and less residual
  unabsorbed iron for intestinal microbiota is the challenge Much research already completed, but new basic science findings can inform further optimization
Efficacy and tolerability (low side-effect profile) tends to correlate with cost; breaking this relationship is critical for low-income settings Immediate and onward
 Crop technology
  Accelerated transgenic crop enhancement programs Can staple foods with enriched iron content (e.g., BioCassava Plus) help bridge the growing gap between flesh food supply and demand ? Medium and long term
 Point-of care diagnostics
  Design, optimization, testing, and production of very 
  low cost point-of-care tests for iron deficiency Inexpensive, simple, and reliable point-of-care tests will be required if a screening approach is to be endorsed. Even if not endorsed diagnosis of ID is clearly important in tropical medicine Immediate and onward
Country level planning
 Endemicity of malaria and ID
  Map regions where malaria and ID overlap
  Understand modifying factors such as altitude, season Governments can make better plans for iron interventions and avoid inaction in nonmalarial areas Immediate and onward
 Integration of programs
  How best to integrate intermittent preventive therapy, 
  bed nets, and iron? Potential adverse reactions can be avoided if interventions against malaria either precede or accompany iron interventions Immediate and onward
Global policy
 Assessing risks vs. benefits
  See above Necessary to balance iron aversion and policy stasis created by Pemba results. Reminder that most interventions (especially vaccines) have risks. Balanced judgment required Short
 Universal vs. targeted approaches
  See above Resolution and guidance required on whether to adopt screening and a targeted approach to combating ID in malarial areas Short
 Global trends in malaria
  Monitor global trends in malaria
  Monitor trends in prevention, surveillance, and 
  treatment Important to keep iron–malaria issue in an appropriate perspective against rapidly changing patterns of disease Immediate and onward

1ID, iron deficiency; NTBI, nontransferrin-bound iron.