Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3):W392–W401. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7255

Table 3.

Comparison of Sensitivities of CADe system and DMIST Study for the Common Cases

iCAD R2
DG SF DG SF
CAD 0.74(119/161)
95% CI:
(0.66,0.81)		 0.69(111/161)
95% CI:
(0.61,0.76)		 0.74(119/161)
95% CI:
(0.66,0.81)		 0.60(97/161)
95% CI:
(0.52,0.68)
DMIST 0.43(69/161)
95% CI:
(0.35,0.51)		 0.41(66/161)
95% CI:
(0.33,0.49)		 0.43(69/161)
95% CI:
(0.35,0.51)		 0.41(66/161)
95% CI:
(0.33,0.49)
CAD v DMIST 0.31
95% CI:
(0.22,0.40)
p<.0001		 0.28
95% CI:
(0.19,0.37)
p<.0001		 0.31
95% CI:
(0.22,0.40)
p<.0001		 0.19
95% CI:
(0.10,0.28)
p<.0001
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure