Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 1;27(5):1072–1079. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.369

Table 4. Multivariate (final) Cox proportional hazards model with left truncation assessing the impact of lenalidomide treatment and baseline factors on AML progressiona.

Variable AML progression
  HR (95% CI) P-value
Lenalidomide-treated vs untreated cohort 0.969 (0.483–1.945) 0.930
Cytogenetic complexity (del(5q) plus >1 abnormality vs isolated) 3.555 (1.576–8.022) 0.002
Cytogenetic complexity (del(5q) plus 1 abnormality vs isolated) 1.095 (0.567–2.114) 0.786
Bone marrow blast count (5–10% vs <5%) 2.158 (1.133–4.098) 0.019
RBC transfusion burden, units/8 weeks 1.090 (1.003–1.185) 0.041
Hemoglobin level, g/dl 0.861 (0.736–1.006) 0.059
a

Lenalidomide treatment, although not significant in the univariate models, was forced to remain in the final models to estimate the magnitude of risk associated with lenalidomide in the presence of other risk factors. Complete covariate data were available for 243 of the lenalidomide-treated patients and 98 of the untreated patients.