Table 3.
Author | Year | N | Type of encounter
|
Video review setting
|
Outcome studied
|
Findings | Video helpful
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS | PE | TS | I | G | SA | S | FB | FA | OA | PA | Yes | No | ||||
Del Mar61 | 1992 | 140 | × | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful | × | ||||||||
Ellison62 | 2008 | 42 | × | × | × | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful. Self-assessment and peer assessment not analyzed | × | ||||||
Goldschmidt93 | 1987 | 20 | × | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful | × | ||||||||
Kardash47 | 1997 | 25 | × | × | × | Self-assessment improved after video review | × | |||||||||
Kraan67 | 1990 | 563 | × | × | FA | Interviewing skills improved after 4 year curriculum that included video review | × | |||||||||
Lane66 | 2004 | 60 | × | × | × | × | Interviewing and self-assessment skills improved after video review | × | ||||||||
Sharp63 | 1996 | 104 | × | × | × | × | × | × | Student satisfaction higher with standardized patient instructor feedback compared to video review | × | ||||||
Shepherd64 | 1984 | 67 | × | × | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful Interviewing skills improved after clerkship curriculum that included video review | × | |||||||
Simek-Downing68 | 1986 | 64 | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful Interviewing skills improved after clerkship curriculum that included video review | × | |||||||||
Wagstaff65 | 1990 | 68 | × | × | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful. Self-assessment and faculty assessment not examined | × | |||||||
White69 | 2009 | 42 | × | × | × | × | × | Remediation involving video review, refectionand self- assessment resulted in improved performance | × | |||||||
Cushing94 | 1995 | 150 | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful | × | |||||||||
Menahem70 | 1987 | 4 | × | × | × | Students had difficulty finding “hidden agenda” in simulated interviews, even with video review | × | |||||||||
Paul95 | 1998 | 27 | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful. Other outcomes not examined | × | |||||
Myung96 | 2010 | NA | × | × | × | × | Students found video review and feedback helpful | × | ||||||||
Menahem33 | 1987 | 4 | × | × | × | × | Interviews improved after video feedback | × |
Abbreviations: N, number of students; CS, communication skills; PE, physical exam; TS, technical skills; I, individual; G, group; SA, self-assessment; S, satisfaction; FB, feedback; FA, faculty assessment; OA, other assessment; PA, peer assessment.