Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 4;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-13-13

Table 1.

Summary of the methods used and numbers of genetic clusters found in each ostracod study

Project Strategy Dates # of sites Net μm Primary target of collection Number of clusters separated by 2% divergence Number of specimens barcoded Number of clusters captured that only appeared in 1 or 2 sampling strategies
CHUBL
Time- based effort
July 7–21, 2007
9
100
Ostracoda
18
78
5
SAOST
Rapid Blitz
July 9–17, 2008
14
100
Microcrustacea
18
79
6
COCSA
Liberal re-sort
July 7–21, 2007 & July 9–17, 2008
14
100
Ostracoda (re-sort)
29
124
13
OZFWZ
Fixed- protocol
June 3-Aug 25, 2010
27 (75)
64, 100, 250
Insecta (with mixed invertebrates retained)
17
63
5
OZFWC Flexible- protocol July 22-Aug 2, 2011 27 (42) 153 Microcrustacea 29 154 13

Study codes “CHUBL”, “SAOST”, “COCSA”, “OZFWC”, and “OZFWZ” refer to codes for each specimen on BOLD (“Process IDs”), each associated with one strategy. These five study codes can be found in three projects (COCSA, OZFWC and OZFWZ) on the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD Systems: http://www.boldsystems.org). For the column “# of sites”, all values shown without brackets represent the number of sites sampled where ostracods were found. Bracketed values represent the total number of sites for the strategy, including those where ostracods were not found. For the first three strategies, the total number of sites and number of sites with ostracods are the same due to targeted selection of suitable habitats.