Skip to main content
. 2013 May 4;14:304. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-304

Table 6.

ceh-20 and unc-62 control AQR and PQR migration and modify mab-5(e1751)gof

 
 AQR position (%)1
 PQR position (%)1
Genotype/strain 1 2 3 4 5 n 1 2 3 4 5 n
wild-type
 100
 0
 0
 0
 0
 100
 0
 0
 0
 0
 100
 100
mab-5(e1751)
 0
 0
 0
 8
 92
 100
 0
 0
 0
 0
 100
 100
ceh-20(ay9)
 100
 0
 0
 0
 0
 100
 6
 16
 31
 22
 25
 100
ceh-20(mu290)
 22
 50
 25
 3
 0
 32
 5
 3
 10
 46
 36
 39
ceh-20(RNAi)
 89
 7
 1
 3
 0
 100
 0
 0
 9
 10
 81
 100
unc-62(mu232)
 56
 34
 8
 2
 0
 106
 9
 38
 20
 19
 14
 105
unc-62(e917)
 88
 0
 0
 0
 12
 25
 33
 0
 0
 0
 67
 32
unc-62(e644)
 51
 36
 8
 0
 5
 39
 26
 11
 9
 0
 57
 35
ceh-20(RNAi); mab-5(e1751)
 0
 0
 6
 35
 592
 100
 0
 0
 4
 6
 90
 200
unc-62(mu232); mab-5(e1751)
 0
 2
 12
 51
 352
 100
 0
 1
 2
 15
 82
 100
unc-62(e644); mab-5(e1751)
 36
 10
 5
 5
 442
 51
 17
 4
 2
 2
 75
 51
unc-62(e917); mab-5(e1751) 43 4 0 8 452 28 0 0 0 0 100 28

1AQR and PQR position as described in Methods and Figure 2D.

2Significantly different (p < 0.001) compared to mab-5(e1751) alone (Fisher’s Exact Test).