Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 28;52(6):1042–1051. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes411

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline characteristics in HBM cases and controls

Descriptive characteristic HBM cases Controls P valuea
Age (years), mean (s.d.) 61.7 (13.8) 54.1 (16.2) <0.001
BMI (kg/m2), mean (s.d.) 30.5 (5.9) 28.0 (4.8) <0.001
Sum hip and L1 Z-scores, mean (s.d.) 6.96 (2.2) 0.98 (1.8) <0.001
Max total hip Z-score (n = 529), mean (s.d.) 3.00 (1.2) 0.53 (0.9) <0.001
L1 Z-score (n = 542), mean (s.d.) 3.92 (1.5) 0.48 (1.2) <0.001
Female 270 (76.5) 92 (46.7) <0.001
    Post-menopausal 218 (82.9) 48 (54.6) <0.001
    Oestrogen replacement (ever) 128 (52.7) 15 (19.2) <0.001
Prior fractureb 134 (38.0) 90 (45.7) 0.077
Any joint replacement risk factor (not OA)c 24 (6.8) 3 (1.5) 0.006
English IMD quartiles (n = 496)d
    1 (most deprived) 38 (11.9) 18 (10.2)
    2 68 (21.3) 36 (20.3) 0.909
    3 100 (31.4) 56 (31.6)
    4 (least deprived) 113 (35.4) 67 (37.9)

Results presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated. n = 550 (i.e. 353 cases and 197 controls) except where stated. aP values shown from t-test (continuous variables) and χ2 test (categorical variables) comparing HBM cases with controls. bAny lifetime fracture regardless of mechanism. cIncludes RA (n = 17), AS (n = 2), SLE with joint involvement (n = 2), PsA (n = 5), steroid-induced avascular necrosis leading to hip replacement (n = 1). dQuartiles of IMD ranks compared with the whole of England (1–32 482), 1: most deprived.