Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 20;304(10):F1258–F1265. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00401.2012

Table 2.

Effect of ANG-(1–7) and/or A779, BAPTA, and/or thapsigargin in maximum cytosolic calcium concentration of isolated proximal tubules from rats

Experimental Groups [Ca2+]i, nM n
Control 101 ± 2 6
ANG-(1–7) (10−12 M) 252 ± 8* 5
ANG-(1–7) (10−9 M) 203 ± 3* 6
ANG-(1–7) (10−6 M) 153 ± 8* 5
A779 (10−6 M) 126 ± 2* 5
ANG-(1–7) (10−12 M) + A779 114 ± 7 5
ANG-(1–7) (10−9 M) + A779 96 ± 4 5
ANG-(1–7) (10−6 M) + A779 105 ± 5 5
BAPTA (5 × 10−5 M) 58 ± 3* 5
BAPTA + ANG-(1–7) (10−9 M) 106 ± 3 5
BAPTA + ANG-(1–7) (10−6 M) 82 ± 2* 6
Thapsigargin (10−5 M) 341 ± 9* 5
Thapsigargin + ANG-(1–7) (10−9 M) 356 ± 9* 5
Thapsigargin + ANG-(1–7) (10−6 M) 342 ± 12* 5

Values are the means ± SE; n = number of tubules (each tubule corresponds to the average of 10 areas). [Ca2+]i, intracellular Ca2+ concentration.

*

P < 0.01 vs. control;

P < 0.01 vs. ANG-(1–7) alone in the respective dose.