Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: BJU Int. 2013 Apr 2;111(7):1068–1074. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11729.x

TABLE 1.

Clinical and pathological characteristics and lymph node and inguinal field assessment

Patient number Age (years) Body mass index (kg/m2) Tumour classification Clinical node classification No. positive superficial inguinal nodes/total removed No. positive deep nodes/total removed No. positive pelvic nodes/total removed Verifying surgeon’s assessment
Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right
Lymph node metastases
1 70 36.2 T3 N1* 2/10 1/9 0/2 0/15 0/18 Complete Complete
3 28 40.7 T3 N0 2/8 5/15 1/2 0/11 0/19 Complete Complete
No lymph node metastases
2 67 38.4 T1b N0 0/21 0/17 Complete Complete
4 84 26.9 T3 N0 0/6 0/8 Complete Complete
5 68 26.4 T2 N0 0/6 0/7 Complete NA
6 60 28.9 T1b N0 0/5 0/6 Incomplete§ Complete
7 59 35.7 T2 N0 0/6 0/7 Complete Complete
8 60 33.4 T2 N0 0/15 0/14 Complete Complete
9 54 21.5 T2 N0 0/11 0/9 Complete Complete
10 64 25.8 T1b N0 0/5 0/6 Complete Complete
*

Based on imaging, impalpable.

Fibrofatty tissue removed, no lymph nodes found.

Initial RAVEIL approach, converted to open.

§

Two additional lymph nodes found, benign.

NA, not assessed.