. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 27.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013 Mar 27;42(3):405–417. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.777917

Table 2.

Results of Path Analysis

Participants N = 79

Model path	B	Posterior SD	β	95% credibility interval
Video feedback → NRS (age 3)	−.75^**	.39	−.22	−1.57 \| .066
Video feedback → coercive interactions (age 5)	.00	.02	.02	−.037 \| .043
NRS (age 3) → coercive interactions (age 5)	.02*	.01	.28	.003 \| .029
Coercive interactions (age 2) → coercive interactions (age 5)	.26	.09	.31	.057 \| .441
Coercive interactions (age 2) → NRS (age 3)	−1.20	1.96	−.08	−4.646 \| 2.583
NRS (age 2) → NRS (age 3)	.35	.11	.36	.171 \| .612
Engagement in FCU → coercive interactions (age 5)	.02	.02	.16	−.014 \| .052
Cumulative risk → coercive interactions (age 5)	.00	.01	.02	−.014 \| .018
Indirect effect

Video feedback → NRS (age 3) → coercive interactions (age 5)	−0.10*	.09	−.06	−.309 \|− .001

Note. NRS = negative relational schema; FCU = Family Check-Up;

^**

p < .01; *p < .05.