Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 17;2013:204908. doi: 10.1155/2013/204908

Table 3.

Summary of metabolites revealed in this study.

Metabolites Group A versus Group C
(fold change)
P value Group B versus Group C
(fold change)
P value Group A versus Group B
(fold change)
P value Pathways
Butanedioic acid +1.15 NS −1.86* 0.043 +2.13## 0.008 Energy metabolism
Propanoic acid −2.20* 0.02 −1.11 NS −1.97# 0.025 Energy metabolism
Acetic acid −1.02 NS +1.65* 0.04 −1.68## 0.004 Flora metabolism
Ethanedioic acid −2.24* 0.014 −2.32** 0.003 +1.03 NS Energy metabolism
Butanoic acid −1.18 NS +1.36 NS −1.60# 0.02 Flora metabolism
Glycine +1.97* 0.039 +1.55 NS +1.27 NS Amino acid metabolism
2,3-Dihydroxybutanoic acid +1.23 NS +2.27* 0.047 −1.85# 0.032 Flora metabolism
Aminomalonic acid −3.21** 0.002 −2.16* 0.017 +1.49 NS Unknown
Cysteine +2.11* 0.028 +2.40* NS +1.79# 0.04 Amino acid metabolism
Benzoic acid +2.12* 0.016 +1.80* 0.029 −1.1 NS Flora metabolism
D-Mannose +1.71* 0.042 +1.48** 0.006 −1.93# 0.011 Energy metabolism
Sedoheptulose +1.11 NS +3.30* 0.038 −1.33 NS Energy metabolism
D-Gluconic acid −1.84* 0.016 +1.00 NS −1.84# 0.01 Energy metabolism
Myo-inositol −1.08 NS +1.79* 0.042 −1.93## 0.0045 Energy metabolism
Tryptophan +2.08* 0.016 +2.05* 0.035 +1.01 NS Amino acid metabolism
Pseudouridine +1.43 NS +1.89* 0.033 −1.32 NS Nucleotide metabolism
α-D-Glucopyranoside −2.84* 0.033 −1.61 NS −1.76 NS Energy metabolism

“+” and “−” represent the relative increased (or decreased) concentration of metabolites; fold changes were obtained by calculating the relative concentration between the two group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with Group C (thin white coating); ## P < 0.01, # P < 0.05 compared between Group A (thick yellow coating) and Group B (thick white coating); NS indicates nonsignificant; statistical significance (P < 0.05, unpaired Student's t-test).