. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 13.

Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Nov;39(6):426–439. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0362-z

Table 3. Effect of IT on 12-month counseling visits by symptom clusters^a^,^b.

Probability of counseling use	Coefficient (SE)	Level of counseling use for users	Coefficient (SE)
Low symptom severity (C1-Sx) × IT	0.057	Low symptom severity (C1-Sx) × IT	0.087
	(0.352)		(0.114)
Moderate-severe PTSD (C2-Sx) × IT	0.245	Moderate-severe PTSD (C2-Sx) × IT	−0.227^**
	(0.414)		(0.087)
Severe PTSD (C3-Sx) × IT	0.180	Severe PTSD (C3-Sx) × IT	0.116
	(0.487)		(0.087)
Drugs & moderate-severe PTSD (C4-Sx) × IT	−0.347	Drugs & moderate-severe PTSD (C4-Sx) × IT	−0.026
	(0.368)		(0.145)
Alcohol & severe PTSD (C5-Sx) × IT	−0.288	Alcohol & severe PTSD (C5-Sx) × IT	0.080
	(0.611)		(0.160)
Alcohol & moderate PTSD (C6-Sx) × IT	−0.128	Alcohol & moderate PTSD (C6-Sx) × IT	−0.037
	(0.476)		(0.156)
Severe comobidity (C7-Sx) × IT	−0.080	Severe comobidity (C7-Sx) × IT	−0.229
	(0.401)		(0.132)
Constant	−0.099	Constant	3.747^**
	(0.650)		(0.211)

n = 2,001; Robust standard errors in parentheses

Significant at 5%;

^**

significant at 1%

Zero-inflated negative binomial models

All models controlled for site-level fixed effects and selected person-level characteristics

Table 3. Effect of IT on 12-month counseling visits by symptom clustersa,b.