Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 7;280(1760):20130554. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0554

Table 3.

Model-averaged coefficients (±s.e) for the hazard function for age at recruitment (h(a), Cox proportional hazard model) and relative number of chicks fledged (Fr, ordinary least-squares regression) for sets of best models (ΔAIC < 2). Levels of statistical significance as in table 1. Relative performances of the models for h(a) and Fr are presented in tables 2 and 4, respectively. TN denotes experimental treatment during the chick stage; Gm, daily growth rate (g d−1) during the chick stage; α, age at recruitment; TB, experimental treatment at recruitment; Pm, peak mass (g) during the chick stage.

explanatory variable h(a) Inline graphic Fr Inline graphic
intercept −1.85 (0.90)*
sex (M) 0.31 (0.25) −0.153 (0.18)^
TN (unfed) 1.11 (0.63)*
rank B 0.34 (0.21)
rank S −0.13 (0.29)
TB (unfed) −0.59 (0.19)** 0.34 (0.21)
Gm −0.03 (0.05) 0.06 (0.03)^
α 0.21 (0.07)**
TN (unfed) : α −0.16 (0.09)^
TN (unfed) : TB (unfed) −0.67 (0.29)*
Pm −0.15 (0.18)*