Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec 1;16(12):e343–e355.

Table 2.

Quality of care by condition.

ALL DATA
INTERVENTION CONTROL
Condition Patient N Eligible care process N Recommended care completed (%) Patient N Eligible care process N Recommended care completed (%) P value (I vs. C)*
Dementia 51 301 51 60 286 30 <0.001
Depression 12 77 51 4 25 28 0.07
Falls 36 221 44 22 108 17 0.002
Heart failure 36 114 82 32 86 71 0.06
Incontinence 26 128 58 8 38 26 0.01
TOTAL 108 841 54 92 543 34 <0.001
CONDITIONS DESIGNATED “TOP PRIORITY” BY REFERRING MD
INTERVENTION CONTROL
Condition Patient N Eligible care process N Recommended care completed (%) Patient N Eligible care process N Recommended care completed (%) P value (I vs. C)*
Dementia 27 184 56 42 208 35 0.002
Depression 7 49 49 2 12 25 0.15
Falls 15 101 61 9 41 10 0.001
Heart failure 13 43 91 17 56 71 0.03
Incontinence 21 102 60 2 10 40 0.35
TOTAL 81 479 60 67 327 38 <0.001
*

P value compares percent of recommended care processes completed in the intervention (I) versus control (C) group using multilevel logistic regression models adjusted for clustering as described in the Methods section.

Table showing quality of care by condition in the intervention group and control group of the nurse practitioner intervention. The columns entitled “Eligible care process N” represents the total number of care processes for each condition for which patients in the columns entitled “Patient N” were eligible. The top half of the table represents data on all care processes; the bottom half of the table represents data only for care process among conditions designated “top priority” for referral (note that patients could have multiple conditions – or no conditions -- designated as top priority by the referring physician).