Skip to main content
. 2013 May 13;8(5):e61351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061351

Table 4. Exposure characteristics of acute hepatitis E patients and age-matched controls.

Conservative Case Definition Liberal Case Definition
Cases Controls Odds Ratio (CLR) Cases Controls Odds Ratio (CLR)
(N = 24) (N = 68) (95% CI) (N = 46) (N = 134) (95% CI)
Exposure Characteristics No. (%) No (%) No. (%) No (%)
Primary Employment Location
Indoors 11 (45.8) 40 (58.8) 1.0 15 (32.6) 69 (51.5) 1.0
Outdoors 13 (54.2) 28 (41.2) 1.63 (0.57–4.62) 31 (67.4) 65 (48.5) 3.17 (1.35–7.47)
Livestock Ownership *
Cows (Any) 5 (20.8) 27 (39.7) 0.35 (0.10–1.15) 13 (28.3) 53 (39.6) 0.62 (0.29–1.31)
Goats (Any) 5 (20.8) 19 (27.9) 0.61 (0.18–2.12) 13 (28.3) 30 (22.4) 1.42 (0.63–3.24)
Chickens (Any) 11 (45.8) 38 (55.9) 0.52 (0.18–1.47) 26 (56.5) 72 (53.7) 1.05 (0.53–2.07)
Ducks (Any) 14 (58.3) 34 (50.0) 1.17 (0.45–3.05) 29 (63.0) 65 (48.5) 1.58 (0.79–3.16)
Recent ** travel to town/city
None 6 (25.0) 45 (66.2) 1.0 20 (43.5) 90 (67.2) 1.0
Any § 18 (75.0) 23 (33.8) 10.23 (2.17–48.15) 26 (56.5) 44 (32.8) 2.37 (1.15–4.87)
“Eating Out” frequency
Never 17 (70.8) 57 (83.8) 1.0 28 (60.9) 106 (79.1) 1.0
<7 times/wk 5 (20.8) 6 (8.8) 2.98 (0.77–11.56) 12 (26.1) 18 (13.4) 3.15 (1.16–8.52)
7+ times/wk 2 (8.3) 5 (7.4) 0.63 (0.07–5.51) 6 (13.0) 10 (7.5) 1.80 (0.58–5.56)
Recent “Jaundice” contact **, ‡
None 17 (73.9) 64 (97.0) 1.0 34 (75.6) 127 (97.0) 1.0
Any § 6 (26.1) 2 (3.0) 10.83 (2.18–53.79) 11 (24.4) 4 (3.1) 9.63 (3.06–30.37)
Recent Traditional Healer Visit **
None 5 (20.8) 59 (86.8) 1.0 12 (26.1) 118 (88.1) 1.0
Any §, ‡‡ 19 (79.2) 9 (13.2) 39.45 (5.18–300.24) 34 (73.9) 16 (11.9) 35.55 (8.42–150.05)
Recent Injection **
None 16 (66.7) 55 (80.9) 1.0 29 (63.0) 98 (73.1) 1.0
Any 8 (33.3) 13 (19.1) 1.80 (0.55–5.87) 17 (37.0) 36 (26.9) 1.86 (0.79–4.35)
Type of Household Latrine
Open/Hanging (Unsanitary) 16 (66.7) 30 (44.1) 1.0 25 (54.4) 56 (41.8) 1.0
Sealed/Slab (Sanitary) || 8 (33.3) 38 (55.9) 0.28 (0.09–0.90) 21 (45.7) 78 (58.2) 0.54 (0.26–1.13)
Drinking Water Source
Tubewell 23 (100.0) 58 (85.3) - 42 (93.3) 121 (90.3) 1.0
Pond 0 2 (2.9) - 1 (2.2) 3 (2.2) 1.22 (0.10–14.4)
River 0 8 (11.8) - 9 (6.7) 2 (4.4) 0.69 (0.14–3.46)
Cooking Water Source
Tubewell 2 (8.7) 3 (4.4) 1.0 3 (6.7) 5 (3.7) 1.0
Pond 17 (73.9) 43 (63.2) 0.56 (0.09–3.41) 32 (71.1) 88 (65.7) 0.60 (0.14–2.53)
River 4 (17.4) 22 (32.4) 0.23 (0.03–1.98) 10 (22.2) 41 (30.6) 0.36 (0.07–1.89)
Average Water Consumption ††
≤7 glasses per day 7 (29.2) 37 (54.4) 1.0 14 (30.4) 72 (53.7) 1.0
≥8 glasses per day 17 (70.8) 31 (45.6) 3.11 (0.92–10.55) 32 (69.6) 62 (46.3) 2.83 (1.19–6.74)

NB. Conservative case definition includes only individuals found to be anti-HEV IgM seropositive by the AFRIMS assay. The liberal case definition includes individuals found positive by either AFRIMS or the MBS assay.

*

“None” is not shown, comparison of livestock ownership uses “None” as the reference category (OR = 1.0).

**

Recent is defined as in the three months prior to the onset of illness/interview

Defined as the number of times eating food prepared outside the home in an average week.

§

p<0.005, Univariate conditional (fixed effects) logistic regression (CLR) comparing cases and controls.

“Don't know” (n<5) responses not shown/included in analysis.

||

p<0.05, Univariate conditional (fixed effects) logistic regression comparing cases and controls.

††

In an age category stratified analysis (≤15, 16–30,>30) only the≤15 group remained significantly at risk, likely due to low n's in each age category.

‡‡

This association likely reflects a local practice of seeking initial care from traditional “faith” healers early during hepatitis-like illnesses.