Skip to main content
. 2013 May 13;8(5):e62950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062950

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in this meta-analysis.

First author Year Location material Patient and control Method RARβ2 (M/U)b Pa(M/U)b GS(M/U)b
case control Low-gradec High-grade Low-GSd High-GS
Dumache R 2012 Romania blood 91/94 QMSP 89/91 10/94 - - - -
Bastian PJ 2007 Germany tissues 78/30 MSP 56/78 1/38 32/47 24/31 30/48 26/30
Rouprêt M 2007 UK urine 95/32 QMSP 59/95 1/32 - - 28/55 31/40
Hanson JA 2006 USA tissues 5/5 QMSP 4/5 0/5 - - 3/18 8/20
Henrique R 2006 USA tissues 30/30 QMSP 26/30 6/30 18/20 2/10 14/15 13/15
Hoque MO 2005 USA urine 52/91 QMSP 18/52 8/91 7/24 11/28 11/24 7/28
Jerónimo C 2004 USA tissue 118/30 QMSP 115/118 7/30 - - - -
Karen Woodson 2004 USA tissue 24/11 MSP 18/24 0/11 - - 11/35 7/9
Jingmei Zhang 2004 USA tissue 50/2 MSP 42/50 0/2 - - 14/18 28/32
Yamanaka M 2003 Japan tissue 109/36 MSP 85/109 0/36 29/39 56/70 33/47 52/62
Maruyama R 2002 USA tissue 101/25 MSP 54/101 1/25 12/26 22/34 11/36 44/65
Nakayama T 2001 Japan tissue 24/10 MSP 20/24 0/10 - - - -

MSP, methylati on specific PCR; QMSP, quantitative methylation specific PCR. aP pathologic stage; bRARβ2 methylated/RARβ2 unmethylated; cpathologic stage≤ T2 was defined as low-stage and pathologic stage≥ T3 was defined as high-stage; dGleason score≤6 was defined as low-GSand Gleason score≥7 was defined as high-GS.