Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 17;97(6):1188–1194. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.055285

TABLE 2.

BOLD responsivity during anticipated palatable food intake as a function of energy intake (n = 155)1

x, y, z k Peak z Peak 2 Peak 3
Lateral visual cortex L −27, −76, 37 57 4.33 0.35 7.6 × 10ndash6
−21, −73, 43 3.65 0.29 1.3 × 10ndash4
Posterior middle temporal gyrus R 48, −28, −8 86 4.24 0.34 1.1 × 10ndash5
51, −37, −2 4.22 0.34 1.2 × 10ndash5
51, −19, −11 3.71 0.30 1.0 × 10ndash4
Precuneus R 9, −67, 25 203 4.14 0.33 1.7 × 10ndash5
9, −79, 22 4.06 0.34 2.4 × 10ndash5
12, −79, 34 3.65 0.29 1.3 × 10ndash4
Supramaginal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus4 L −60, −52, 16 29 4.06 0.33 2.5 × 10ndash5
−63, −43, 4 3.43 0.28 2.9 × 10ndash4
Frontal operculum4 L −45, 23, 1 13 3.99 0.32 3.3 × 10ndash5
Supramaginal gyrus R 54, −46, 16 33 3.94 0.32 4.1 × 10ndash5
63, −43, 16 3.62 0.29 1.5 × 10ndash4
Cuneus L −12, −79, 28 27 3.86 0.31 5.7 × 10ndash5
Anterior cingulate cortex L −12, 38, 25 18 3.84 0.31 6.2 × 10ndash5
Posterior cingulate cortex L −12, −46, 40 13 3.79 0.30 7.5 × 10ndash5
Precuneus4 L −6, −67, 34 14 3.55 0.29 1.9 × 10ndash4
1

Anticpated palatable food intake > anticipated tasteless solution intake with the resting metabolic rate and percentage of body fat controlled for. BOLD, blood oxygen level dependent; k, cluster size; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; r, effect size.

2

r values were derived from z values (z/√N) of the peak voxel.

3

Data presented are corrected for multiple comparisons across the whole brain (P < 0.05) on the basis of Monte Carlo data simulations.

4

k was <12 when controlled for self-reported hunger.