Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009 Nov;2(11):966–974. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0062

Table 3.

Ability of WLE and AFV in detecting the highest histologic grade lesion in 56 patients with at least one OPL or cancer

Highest histologic grade lesion in the patient WLE
AFV
None of the highest-grade lesions diagnosed Some of the highest-grade lesions diagnosed* All of the highest-grade lesions diagnosed None of the highest-grade lesions diagnosed Some of the highest-grade lesions diagnosed* All of the highest-grade lesions diagnosed P
Low-grade lesions
 Parakeratosis with atypia (n = 8) 5 2 1 1 2 5
 Mild dysplasia (n = 21) 11 6 4 2 5 14
 Total 16 8 5 3 7 19 0.001
High-grade lesions
 Moderate dysplasia (n = 8) 2 6 8
 Severe dysplasia (n = 2) 2 2
 CIS or micro invasive SCC (n = 7) 1 2 4 7
 Total 3 2 12 0 0 17 0.22
Cancers
 Invasive SCC (n = 8) 1 1 6 1 7
 Other carcinoma (n = 2) 1 1 2
 Total 2 1 7 0 1 9 0.47
Total 21 11 24 3 8 45 <0.001
*

Some, but not all, of the highest-grade lesions diagnosed.

P value for WLE findings compared with AFV calculated by two-tailed Fisher’s exact test.

Includes one patient with adenocarcinoma (salivary gland carcinoma) and one with verrucous carcinomas with SCC component.