Conflicting agendas among stakeholders; competing priorities (eg, financial interests, staff availability; timing). |
Negotiate an initial written document detailing roles, time commitments, expectations, and goals, including ownership of data. |
Community partners’ needs and preferences differ from researcher’s agenda; power dynamics shift over the different stages of the research. |
Be flexible in expectations and rules for partnership development; recognize that conflicts may be unavoidable and effective partnership development takes time. |
Ensuring long-term continuity as different stakeholders may have evolving work charges. |
Make a shifting membership explicit; recognize that such shifts are not an indicator of failure. |
Structural issues: institutional and funder policies conflict with partnership development; bureaucratic guidelines complicate exchange of financial resources, staff turnover, service system changes, and maintaining involvement of parties; physical distance and limited transportation deter participation. |
Maintain researcher presence in community discussions both before and after the funded phase to build long-term trust despite structural constraints; work together to develop a sustainable infrastructure for the partnership and for the service initiatives launched through the partnership. |
Resource and labor intensity of partnered research curtail participation in and documentation of the research. |
Varied solutions based upon individual nature of partners and cultures; recognize time and resources to document the partnership process; build relationships before data collection; explore innovative means of capturing process and outcomes. |