TABLE 5.
Parameters |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Est | SE | Est/SEa | StdYX |
Coordination by indicators | ||||
MDSC time | −2.309 | 0.408 | −5.655 | −0.853 |
MDSC helper time | 1.778 | 0.309 | 5.759 | 0.759 |
Integration by indicators | ||||
MDS system assimilated | 8.190 | 1.374 | 5.960 | 0.886 |
Care planning impact | 4.569 | 1.020 | 4.479 | 0.494 |
Interdisciplinary team by indicators | ||||
Basic disciplines | 2.504 | 0.719 | 3.481 | 0.687 |
Restorative disciplines | 0.555 | 0.152 | 3.645 | 0.478 |
Restorative perspective by indicators | ||||
Mobility and continence | 5.969 | 1.052 | 5.673 | 0.654 |
Dressing and eating | 6.104 | 1.059 | 5.763 | 0.669 |
Cognition | 5.615 | 1.037 | 5.413 | 0.616 |
Quality 1 by F-Tags | ||||
F274 | 0.170 | 0.086 | 1.984 | 0.470 |
F276 | 0.081 | 0.043 | 1.902 | 0.397 |
F278 | 0.287 | 0.147 | 1.959 | 0.655 |
Quality 2 by F-Tags | ||||
F272 | 0.304 | 0.060 | 5.065 | 0.560 |
F279 | 0.739 | 0.119 | 6.203 | 0.873 |
F280 | 0.131 | 0.065 | 2.010 | 0.215 |
F281 | 0.417 | 0.092 | 4.549 | 0.498 |
F282 | 0.251 | 0.064 | 3.901 | 0.424 |
F309 | ||||
Integration by interdisciplinary team and restorative perspective | ||||
Interdisciplinary team | 0.569 | 0.212 | 2.679 | 0.522 |
Restorative perspective | 0.405 | 0.145 | 2.787 | 0.399 |
Care planning integrity by subconstructs | ||||
Coordination | 0.425 | 0.149 | 2.851 | 0.391 |
Integration | 0.400 | 0.152 | 2.633 | 0.371 |
Quality 1 | 1.706 | 0.979 | 1.743 | 0.863 |
Quality 2 | 0.844 | 0.229 | 3.685 | 0.645 |
Other parameters | ||||
Care planning integrity by F309 | 1.183 | 0.191 | 6.200 | 0.685 |
MDSC helper time with basic disciplines | 3.081 | 0.785 | 3.926 | 0.283 |
Note. Est = estimate; SE = standard error of the estimate; StdYX = standardized association coefficient; MDS = Minimum Data Set for Resident Assessment and Care Screening; MDSC = an RN coordinating the care planning process.
p ≤ .05 = Est/SE 1.65; p ≤ .01 = Est/SE 2.33; p ≤ .001 = Est/SE 3.08 (Glasnapp and Poggio, 1985).