Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun 23;71(10):1698–1701. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201659

Table 3.

The association between erosive and non-erosive hand osteoarthritis (OA) and bone mineral density of the femoral neck (linear regression analyses)

Crude B (95% CI) Adjusted B (95% CI)*
Model 1 (comparison of three groups of participants)
 No DIP/PIP OA (ref) 0.00 0.00
 Erosive OA −0.06 (−0.08, −0.03) 0.01 (−0.01, 0.03)
 Non-erosive OA −0.02 (−0.03, −0.01) 0.01 (−0.001, 0.02)
Model 2 (number of affected DIP/PIP joints) (all participants, one model)
 Erosive joints −0.007 (−0.011, −0.003) −0.001 (−0.005, 0.003)
 Non-erosive joints −0.005 (−0.007, −0.003) 0.002 (−0.001, 0.004)
*

Adjusted for age, sex and BMI.

B, regression coefficient (unstandardised β); BMI, body mass index; DIP, distal interphalangeal; PIP, proximal interphalangeal.