Table 3.
The association between erosive and non-erosive hand osteoarthritis (OA) and bone mineral density of the femoral neck (linear regression analyses)
Crude B (95% CI) | Adjusted B (95% CI)* | |
---|---|---|
Model 1 (comparison of three groups of participants) | ||
No DIP/PIP OA (ref) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Erosive OA | −0.06 (−0.08, −0.03) | 0.01 (−0.01, 0.03) |
Non-erosive OA | −0.02 (−0.03, −0.01) | 0.01 (−0.001, 0.02) |
Model 2 (number of affected DIP/PIP joints) (all participants, one model) | ||
Erosive joints | −0.007 (−0.011, −0.003) | −0.001 (−0.005, 0.003) |
Non-erosive joints | −0.005 (−0.007, −0.003) | 0.002 (−0.001, 0.004) |
Adjusted for age, sex and BMI.
B, regression coefficient (unstandardised β); BMI, body mass index; DIP, distal interphalangeal; PIP, proximal interphalangeal.