Skip to main content
. 2013 May 7;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-39

Table 1.

PFS dimensions

Direction of aggression Type of aggression
Obstacle dominance (OD)
Ego-defence (ED)
Needs- persistence (NP)
(The obstacle is prominent) The people are prominent The solution is prominent
Extra-aggression (EA)
E’ - The presence of the obstacle frustrating is emphasized insistently.
E – Blame and hostility are directed toward a person or object in the environment.
E - A solution to the frustrating situation is requested insistently to another person.
Towards others
Example: “Stupid car!”
Example: “Great! I am going to be late because of you!
Example: “Well! Can you call a cab then?”
Intra-aggression (IA)
I’ - The frustrating obstacle is presented as not frustrating or even beneficial; on the other hand, the subject emphasizes his/her embarrassment to be involved in causing frustration to someone else.
I – Blame and hostility are directed towards the person himself/herself.
The subject offers a repair to fix the problem because of a sense of guilt.
Towards themselves
Example: “No. It’s fine. I didn’t want to get that train anyway”
Example: “Oh no, it was my fault!”
Example: “It’s OK. I’ll pay for another thicket”.
Im-magrassion (MA)
M’ - Obstacle in the frustrating situation is minimized, almost to the point of denying its existence
M - Blame for the situation is avoided because the situation is seen as unavoidable; the person who causes frustration is absolved.
M - The subject expresses the hope that the time or circumstances lead to the solution of the problem. Patience and optimism are the main characteristics.
Neutralized/no aggression Example: “No problem, at all” Example: “Don’t worry, it’s not your fault that the car was broken” Example: “Never mind. There’ll be another one soon”