Table B1.

Accuracy Data for High-Salience Targets on Single- and Dual-Target Trials in Experiments 1–8 (Experiments 9 and 10 Did Not Include High-Salience Targets)

	Experimental parameters			Accuracy (%)
Experiment	Time limit	Prevalence high:low	Trial type counts	High single	High dual
1	15 s	1:1	High: 50	88.40 (8.42)	90.19 (7.63)
			Low: 50
			High-Low: 50
			None: 100
2	15 s	2:1	High: 100	94.80 (5.57)	90.02 (9.72)
			Low: 50
			High-Low: 50
			None: 50
3	15 s	3:1	High: 120	95.66 (3.42)	96.07 (3.83)
			Low: 40
			High-Low: 40
			None: 50
4	30 s	2:1	High: 100	94.20 (4.10)	92.64 (6.55)
			Low: 50
			High-Low: 50
			None: 50
5	30 s	3:1	High: 120	95.74 (2.35)	92.13 (8.25)
			Low: 40
			High-Low: 40
			None: 50
6	30 s	6:1	High: 150	93.26 (5.77)	96.08 (5.48)
			Low: 25
			High-Low: 25
			None: 50
7	Luggage line (variable rate)	3:1	High: 96	97.10 (4.60)	95.32 (6.12)
			Low: 32
			High-Low: 32
			None: 40
8	Luggage line (constant rate)	3:1	High: 96	84.91 (7.81)	76.22 (16.15)
			Low: 32
			High-Low: 32
			None: 40

Note. Experiments 1–8 included high-salience targets to calibrate the low-salience targets. However, since the dual-target trial counts were matched to the number of low-salience single-target trials, we did not analyze the two-target effects of salience, nor explore interactions between salience and other factors such as frequency or time limit. We provide the data here for completeness.