Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Feb 6;38(5):10.1002/jmri.24034. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24034

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Scatterplots showing the standard deviation (SD) of the fat fraction estimates in the ROI versus the reference fat fraction value for T2*-IDEAL (◊), ARC/T2*-IDEAL (×), and the proposed method (○). Note that the SD values for T2*-IDEAL (◊) are for 1x acceleration. At all acceleration factors, the average standard deviation for ARC/T2*-IDEAL was higher than that for the proposed method. For all three methods, the low R2 values indicate that the standard deviation of the fat fraction estimates does not exhibit a strong linear dependence on the reference fat fraction value.