Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2012 Sep 8;148(0):391–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.06.028

Table 3.

Unconditional general mixture model growth parameter estimates.

Factor means Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
M. Wald
Est SE Std Est SE Std Est. SE Std
 INT 5.09*** .32 — 10.77*** .43 4.16 18.31*** .64 2.31 429.32***a,b,c
 SLO −.49*** .04 — −.59*** .07 −1.03 −.13 .09 −.14 14.85***b,c
 QUA .01 .01 — .02 .01 .24 .02 .01 .14
 INT — — — 6.70** 2.25 — 62.89*** 7.03 — —
 SLO — — — .34*** .08 — .75*** .14 — —
 QUA — — — .01*** .00 — .03*** .01 — —
Factor covariance
 INT ↔ SLO — — — .38 .27 .27 −1.53** .65 −.22 —
 INT↔ QUA — — — −.12* .05 −.63 −.98*** .15 −.69 —
 SLO ↔ QUA — — — −.03** .02 −.65 .07*** .01 .44 —

Note: INT = intercept, SLO = slope, QUA = quadratic, Est = estimate, SE = standard error, Std = standardized estimate. Due to the centering approach, intercept values represent scores at wave 5 (year 7). Class 1 = low decreasing; Class 2 = moderate decreasing; Class 3 = high stable. M. Wald = Multivariate Wald χ2 (df = 2).

d

Class 1 variance constrained to 0 for identification purposes.

a

C1 vs. C2, p < .0001.

b

C1 vs. C3, p ≤ .0002.

c

C2 vs. C3, p ≤ .004.

**

p < .001.

**

p < .01.

*

p < .05