Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 26;24(5):733–741. doi: 10.1177/0956797612462222

Table 4.

Odds Ratios for Predicting Self-Reported Affective Disorder and Symptom-Based Disorder Diagnoses at Wave 2

Variable Self-reported affective disorder Self-reported affective diagnosis (CIDI-SF)

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Wave 1 self-reported affective disorder 6.58*** [4.09, 10.60] 5.83*** [3.62, 9.37] 6.21*** [3.77, 10.24]
Wave 1 self-reported affective diagnosis (CIDI-SF) 4.48*** [2.32, 8.64] 3.78*** [1.98, 7.21] 3.98*** [2.03, 7.81]
Wave 1 negative-affect level on nonstressor days 1.26* [1.04, 1.53] 1.06 [0.86, 1.31] 1.40*** [1.15, 1.70] 1.31* [1.05, 1.63]
Wave 1 affective reactivity 1.52*** [1.22, 1.89] 1.56*** [1.21, 2.01] 1.46** [1.11, 1.90] 1.25 [0.92, 1.70]
Wave 1 number of stressors 1.30* [1.02, 1.66] 1.11 [0.86, 1.43] 1.10 [0.83, 1.45] 1.06 [0.77, 1.44] 0.87 [0.64, 1.19] 0.91 [0.65, 1.28]
Wave 2 gender (reference = women) 1.54 [0.94, 2.50] 1.81* [1.11, 2.93] 1.69* [1.02, 2.81] 1.60 [0.86, 2.00] 1.97* [1.07, 3.63] 1.72 [0.91, 3.26]
Wave 2 education 0.87 [0.69, 1.10] 0.93 [.74, 1.17] 0.96 [0.75, 1.23] 0.72* [0.53, 0.98] 0.77 [0.58, 1.03] 0.76 [0.56, 1.03]
Wave 2 age 0.84 [0.67, 1.07] 0.88 [0.69, 1.11] 0.86 [0.67, 1.11] 0.64** [0.47, 0.87] 0.64** [0.47, 0.86] 0.65* [0.48, 0.89]

Note: The numbers in brackets represent 95% Wald confidence intervals. Self-reported affective diagnosis was obtained using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form (CIDI-SF; Kessler, Andrews, Mroczek, Ustun, & Wittchen, 1998).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.