Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2013 Mar 1;20(6):667–674. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.01.017

TABLE 3.

Description of reviewed published manuscripts reporting extracolonic findings for lung cancer.

Author Year Country Sample size Age range Mean/Median Age Men Number of ECFa Number of True Positives False Positive Rate Prevalence (per 1000) PPV
Screening populations
Ginnerup Pederson B [33] 2003 Denmark 75 33–78 61 53.3 1 1 0 1.3 100.0
Gluecker TM [21] 2003 US 681 41–80 64 62.6 26 1 3.7 0.1 3.8
Chin M [23] 2005 Australia 432 50–69 - 53.2 3 0 0.7 0 0
Kimberly JR [34] 2008 US 143 44–83 57 48 23 NA - - -
Pickhardt PJ [35] 2010 US 10,286 - 59.8 52.3 NA 8 - 0.1 -
Veerappan GRb [18] 2010 US 2277 - 59 56 5 1 0.2 0.0 20.0
Non-screening populations
Rajapaksa RC [38] 2004 US 250 - 62.5 98 3 NA - - -
Spreng A [22] 2005 Switzerland 102 20–91 66 61.7 NA 1 - 1.0 -
Yee J [39] 2005 US 500 30–90 62.5 100 7 0 1.4 0.0 0.0
Tolan D [28] 2007 UK 400 70–96 79.6 37.5 7 6 0.3 1.5 85.7
Roberts-Thomson IC [25] 2008 Australia 225 25–85 60 51.0 2 NA - - -
White TJ [40] 2009 US 150 40–83 60.9 48.7 NA 1 - 0.7 -
Unknown/Mixed
Hara AK [41] 2000 US 264 33–88 64 55.3 8 0 3.0 0.0 0
Iafrate F [42] 2008 Italy 136 70–92 81 NA 1 NA - - -
Park SK [43] 2009 South Korea 920 34–87 57.3 58.1 9 NA - - -
a

ECF=extracolonic finding, PPV=positive predictive value, NA=not available, (-)=could not calculate

b

Only includes carcinoma detected from the E4 findings, even though additional cancer was detected among persons with E3 findings. The total number of E3 findings could not be determined.