Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb 23;24(5):1113–1126. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00211

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Endogenous and exogenous influences on attention. (A) Effects of top-down cueing during the cue period (Informative > Uninformative; p < .05, corrected). (B) Effects of exogenous cue presentation in the FFA, displayed on an axial slice (z = −15) of the mean anatomical image for all subjects. Red: Group-level FFA ROI derived from independent localizer task. Green: Region in the Right Fusiform Gyrus exhibiting greater activation when exogenous cues were present than when absent (p < .05, corrected). Yellow: Overlap. (C) Effects of exogenous cue and target processing in the presence of uninformative as opposed to informative top-down cues (Uninformative > Informative; p < .05, corrected).