Table 1.
Advantages, disadvantages/challenges, stage of development and potential impact of microfluidic systems on different steps in the clinical translation of nanoparticles.
Advantages | Disadvantages/challenges | Stage of development | Potential impact | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Synthesis |
|
|
***** | Rapid combinatorial, controlled and reproducible synthesis of libraries of distinct nanoparticles for a specific application, and/or reference nanoparticles for toxicology studies |
Characterization |
|
|
* | In-line rapid characterization and optimization of nanoparticles |
In vitro |
|
|
**** | High-throughput studies of nanoparticle toxicity, efficacy, tumour penetration and organ distribution, using ‘organ-on- a-chip’ systems |
In vivo |
|
|
** | Real-time tracking of the distribution or toxicity of nanoparticles on small-scale organisms |
Large-scale synthesis |
|
|
*** | Synthesis of nanoparticles for human administration using stackable parallel microfluidic units |
Rank: Most advanced in development
to least advanced in development, based on the amount of research carried out on each category, as well as the potential ease of adoption by industry.