Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 29;9(4):412–424. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5786

Table 3.

Comparisons on PMS instances with different 2d-neighborhood probability.

(l, d) p2d k q PairMotif+ MEME AlignACE VINE PairMotif
(15, 4) 0.057 5 4 1.00 (2s) 0.93 (6s) 0.64 (4.3m) 0.98 (7.1m) 1.00 (2s)
(14, 4) 0.112 4 4 0.94 (2s) 0.77 (6s) 0.59 (2.7m) 0.91 (8.4m) 0.96 (14s)
(25, 8) 0.149 10 4 1.00 (2.4m) 1.00 (6s) 0.97 (2.5m) 1.00 (9.6m) 1.00 (52.3m)
(24, 8) 0.234 9 4 1.00 (3.0m) 0.98 (6s) 0.86 (2.2m) 0.98(12.2m) > 5h
(18, 6) 0.283 6 3 1.00 (14s) 0.89 (6s) 0.51 (2.1m) 1.00 (9.3m) 1.00 (12.1m)
(15, 5) 0.319 5 3 0.95 (3s) 0.76 (6s) 0.43 (2.2m) 0.70 (8.7m) 0.95 (4.7m)
(17, 6) 0.426 6 3 0.90 (26s) 0.66 (6s) 0.40 (3.6m) 0.80 (9.5m) 0.93 (53.3m)
(19, 7) 0.534 7 3 0.96 (58s) 0.56 (6s) 0.42 (3.2m) 0.76 (10.1m) > 5h
(21, 8) 0.633 8 3 0.94 (18.1m) 0.68 (6s) 0.48 (3.2m) 0.88 (13.4m) > 5h
(23, 9) 0.698 9 3 0.98 (47.9m) 0.76 (6s) 0.53 (3.5m) 0.85 (15.2m) > 5h

Time units, s: seconds; m: minutes; h: hours.