Skip to main content
. 2013 May 6;4(4):336–342. doi: 10.7150/jca.6215

Table 4.

Summary results of Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model evaluating the effect of covariates on overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). (HR is Hazard ratio, MPBC is micropapillary bladder cancer, and UC is traditional urothelial carcinoma).

CPH Model including those with MPBC and UC CPH Model including only those with MPBC
OS CSS OS CSS
Covariate HR p value HR p value HR p value HR p value
Stage 3.30 - T2 vs
Ta/T1/Tis
1.38 - T3/T4 vs T2
1.76 - N+ vs T3/T4
2.23 - M+ vs N+
<0.0001 6.05 - T2 vs
Ta/T1/Tis
1.50 - T3/T4 vs T2
1.93 - N+ vs T3/T4
2.34 - M+ vs N+
<0.0001 3.05 - T2 vs
Ta/T1/Tis
2.78 - T3/T4 vs T2
0.97 - N+ vs T3/T4
1.07 - M+ vs N+
0.0007 2.54 - T2 vs
Ta/T1/Tis
5.97 - T3/T4 vs T2
1.08 - N+ vs T3/T4
1.15 - M+ vs N+
0.0008
Grade
(High vs Low)
1.56 <0.0001 2.93 <0.0001 0.59 0.3169 0.35 0.1878
Age
(per yr)
1.07 <0.0001 1.05 <0.0001 1.06 0.0001 1.03 0.1290
Race
(Black vs not)
1.43 <0.0001 1.61 <0.0001 0.65 0.4990 0.42 0.3978
Sex
(Female vs
Male)
0.93 0.0322 1.14 0.0099 1.07 0.8653 1.15 0.7965
Definitive tx
vs not
0.94 0.2709 0.90 0.0933 0.36 0.0584 0.43 0.1947
MPBC vs TCC 1.04 0.7966 0.80 0.2417