Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2009 Nov 17;64(5):10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00898.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00898.x

Table 1.

Fitness values at a sexually antagonistic locus, after Kidwell et al. (1977). sf and sm (0 < sf,sm ≤ 1) represent the strength of selection in females and males, respectively. hf and hm (0 ≤ hf,hm ≤ 1) are sex-specific dominance parameters; specifically, hf (hm) is the dominance in females (males) of the allele which is deleterious in females (males). Note that hm applies only to the autosomal case. Rice (1984) assumed equal dominance of a given allele in the two sexes; in Kidwell et al.’s notation, this implies hm = 1 − hf. Identities relating Kidwell et al.’s parameters to those used by Rice are given in Appendix Table 1.

Genotype
A1A1 or A1Y A1A2 A2A2 or A2Y
Females, X-linked or autosomal locus 1 1 − hfsf 1 − sf
Males, X-linked locus 1 − sm NA 1
Males, autosomal locus, Rice’s assumption 1 − sm 1 − (1 − hf)sm 1
Males, autosomal locus, general dominance 1 − sm 1 − hmsm 1

NA: not applicable.