Skip to main content
. 2013 May 15;8(5):e64226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064226

Table 5. General discriminant analysis (GDA) models for discriminating between LTBI and active TB disease.

Analytes Resubstitution Classification matrix Leave-one-out Cross validation Wilks lambda f
No TB (%) TB (%) Total (%) No TB (%) TB (%)
EGFAg IL-1RaN IP-10N MCP-3N TNF-αN 80.8 (21/26) 80.0 (12/15) 80.5 (33/41) 80.8 (21/26) 80.0 (12/15) 0.319 74.5
EGFAg IL-1αN IP-10N MCP-3N TNF-αN 88.5 (23/26) 80.0 (12/15) 85.4 (35/41) 80.8 (21/26) 73.3 (11/15) 0.316 75.9
EGFN IL-1αN IP-10N MCP-3N TNF-αN 80.8 (21/26) 86.7 (13/15) 82.9 (34/41) 80.8 (21/26) 80.0 (12/15) 0.364 61.0
EGFAg IP-10N sCD40LN TNF-αNTGF-αN 76.9 (20/26) 80.0 (12/15) 78.0 (32/41) 73.1 (19/26) 73.3 (11/15) 0.355 63.4
EGFAg IL-1αN IP-10N TGF-αN TNF-αN 80.8 (21/26) 86.7 (13/15) 82.9 (34/41) 76.9 (20/26) 80.0 (12/15) 0.350 64.9
EGFAg IL-1αN IP-10N TNF-αN IFN-γN 92.3 (24/26) 73.3 (11/15) 85.4 (35/41) 76.9 (20/26) 73.3 (11/15) 0.317 75.4
EGFN IL-1RaN IP-10N TNF-αN MCP-3N 76.9 (20/26) 86.7(13/15) 80.5 (33/41) 76.9 (20/26) 73.3 (11/15) 0.378 57.6

Participants were not stratified according to HIV status prior to data analysis. In each case, effect df = 1, error df = 32. P- values for all the models were <0.0001. N = unstimulated marker levels, Ag = levels detected in antigen stimulated supernatant, Ag-N = Antigen specific marker levels obtained after background correction.