Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2013 Feb 11;71(1):10.1002/mrm.24639. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24639

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Theoretical analyses of the dependences of APEXw and APTw on exchange rate (k) (A), labile proton concentration (B), R2 (C), and R1 (D). The labile protons were assumed to have a resonance frequency of 3.0 ppm (amine) or 3.5 ppm downfield from water (amide). In all panels, the parameter values were k = 8000 s−1 for amine and k = 30 s−1 for amide, pb = 0.003, R2 = 25 s−1, and R1 = 0.5 s−1, except for the parameter on the x axis. The shaded regions denote the ranges of the amide (10 – 30 s−1) and amine proton exchange rates (700 – 10000 s−1) (1,31). The red and black arrows denote the directions of APEXw and APTw changes, respectively, with decreasing pH under ischemia. APEXw refers to MTRasym at 2.5 ppm measured with the APEX-weighted spin-locking pulse sequence, and APTw refers to MTRasym at 3.5 ppm measured with the APT-weighted CEST technique. The thin gray curves indicate the contribution of amine–water proton exchange effect to APTw signals.