. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Dec 27;42(11):1732–1744. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9893-1

Table 4.

Odds ratios and inverse odds ratios

	High monitors	Communication- focused	Supervision- focused	Maternal over- estimators	Low monitors	p value
Covariates	Reference
Gender		1.35 (0.74)	1.66 (.60)^*	0.58 (1.73)	2.32 (0.43)^*	0.01
Dual biological parents		0.87 (1.14)	0.62 (1.61)	0.74 (1.35)	0.36 (2.76)^*	0.004
Parent education		1.34 (0.75)	0.66 (1.52)	0.68 (1.46)	1.12 (0.90)	.06 ns
Condition		1.45 (0.69)	1.02 (.98)	0.88 (1.14)	0.81 (1.24)	.46 ns
Grade 6 risky behavior
Delinquency		0.82 (1.23)	1.39 (0.72)^*	1.08 (0.93)	1.19 (0.84)	0.006
Substance use initiation		0.89 (1.12)	1.47 (0.68)^*	1.41 (0.71)	1.39 (0.72)^*	0.004
Antisocial peer associations		0.63 (1.58)	1.53 (0.65)^*	1.54 (0.65)	1.44 (0.69)	<.0001
Substance use expectancies		0.86 (1.16)	1.46 (0.69)^*	1.83 (0.55)^*	1.61(0.62)^*	<.0001

All models control for dual biological marital status and gender. Inverse odds ratios are in parenthesis. The reference class is the High Monitors.

An asterisks indicates a significant odds ratio: p < .05