Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 5;16(2):132–138. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.4

Table 4. Logistic and Cox regression analysis for identification of factors associated with ERG+ status.

Factor OR 95% CI P-value
Logistic regression—univariate
 Age quartile 1 1.81 1.35–2.44 0.000*
 Age quartile 2 1.18 0.91–1.56 0.260
 Age quartile 3 0.90 0.71–1.20 0.460
 Age quartile 4 0.53 0.40–0.70 0.000*
 PSA range <4 1.65 1.23–2.22 0.001*
 PSA range 4–10 0.68 0.52–0.91 0.007*
 PSA range ⩾10 0.87 0.59–1.30 0.501
 GS group <7 0.91 0.71–0.11 0.446
 GS group =7 1.31 1.02–1.69 0.030*
 GS group >7 0.65 0.44–0.96 0.290
       
Logistic regressionmultivariate step 1
 GS group >7 1.00 ------------- 0.27
 GS group <7 1.13 0.62–2.07 0.69
 GS group =7 1.45 0.84–2.51 0.18
 PV, ml 0.99 0.97–1.00 0.05
 PSA range ⩾10 1.00   0.58
 PSA range <4 0.77 0.40–1.49 0.43
 PSA range 4–10 0.72 0.39–1.33 0.30
 Age quartile 4 1.00 ------------- 0.05
 Age quartile 1 2.03 1.17–3.50 0.01*
 Age quartile 2 1.41 0.87–2.28 0.17
 Age quartile 3 1.07 0.66–1.75 0.78
 fPSA% 0.99 0.96–1.02 0.65
       
Logistic regressionmultivariate final backward step 4
 Age quartile 4 1.00 ------------- 0.036*
 Age quartile 1 2.05 1.22–3.44 0.007*
 Age quartile 2 1.42 0.89–2.28 0.146
 Age quartile 3 1.01 0.67–1.76 0.673
 PV, ml 0.99 0.99–1.00 0.031*
       
Cox regression (inclusion model)
  RR 95% CI P-value
 ERG+ 1.25 1.09–1.44 0.001*
 PSA 0.96 0.94–0.97 <0.001*

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GS, gleason score; OR, odds ratio; PV, prostate volume.

*P<0.05.

Multivariate logistic regression was performed using a stepwise backward elimination model. OR values of 1.00 indicate reference values with no CI computable. Data of the first and the last steps are shown. For Cox regression the inclusion model was applied.