Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Sep 29;124(3):723–732. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1181-8

Table 3.

Hazard ratios for disease-free survival and overall survival by baseline characteristics (Cox proportional hazards models)

Patient characteristics Disease-free survival
Overall survival
Univariate analysis
Multivariable analysis
Univariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Race
 Asian vs. Caucasian 1.49 (0.51–4.39) 0.47 1.62 (0.47–5.56) 0.45
 Black vs. Caucasian 1.24 (0.42–3.64) 0.69 0.92 (0.31–2.75) 0.88
 Hispanic vs. Caucasian 1.27 (0.57–2.80) 0.56 2.06 (0.75–5.68) 0.16
Age 1.004 (0.98–1.03) 0.78 1.00 (0.97–1.03) 0.99
AJCC Stage
 II vs. III 2.01 (1.02–3.94) 0.04 1.98 (0.92–4.25) 0.08
Tumor grade
 I/II vs. III 1.12 (0.55–2.27) 0.76 0.99 (0.45–2.19) 0.57
ER
 Positive vs. Negative 1.29 (0.68–2.47) 0.44 0.83 (0.40–1.73) 0.62
PR
 Positive vs. Negative 1.41 (0.72–2.77) 0.32 1.05 (0.50–2.20) 0.91
HR status
 Positive vs. Negative 1.30 (0.68–2.47) 0.43 2.18 (1.10–4.33) 0.03 0.80 (0.38–1.69) 0.56
Her2 status
 Positive vs. Negative 0.67 (0.32–1.43) 0.3 0.63 (0.27–1.49) 0.29
Pathologic response
 pCR/pPR vs. pNR 2.85 (1.25–6.51) 0.01 4.08 (1.70–9.80) 0.002 4.27 (1.48–12.29)a 0.01
a

Best fit model chosen from stepwise selection procedures based on likelihood ratio criterion; only pathologic response influences survival when additional variables are included in overall survival models

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, AJCC American Joint Commission on Cancer, ER estrogen receptor, PR progesterone receptor, HR hormone receptor, Her2 human epidermal growth factor receptor, pCR pathologic complete response, pPR pathologic partial response, pNR no pathologic response