Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 17;33(16):7057–7065. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6267-11.2013

Table 1.

RM ANOVA results for Crtl1 ko mice vs Crtl1-Tg and wt mice

Main effect or interaction F p Simple main effects
Discrimination ratio with delays of 1 min, 3 h, 24 h, 48 h
    Genotype F(2,25) = 32.7 <0.001 Crtl1 ko vs wt: F(1,21) = 21.34, p <0.001
Crtl1 ko vs Crtl1-Tg: F1,16 = 18.2, p <0.001
Crtl1-Tg vs wt: F > 1, p = 0.842
    Delay F(3,75) = 31.1 <0.001
    Genotype × delay F(6,75) = 9.2 = 0.003 Crtl1 ko vs wt
Crtl1-Tg vs wt
1 min: F <1, p = 0.121 1 min: F <1, p = 0.778
3 h: F(1,21) = 4.1, p = 0.014 3 h: F <1, p = 0.971
24 h: F(1,21) = 4.5, p = 0.030 24 h: F <1, p = 0.882
48 h: F(1,21) = 10.2, p <0.001 48 h: F <1, p = 0.612
Discrimination ratio with delays of 24 h and 48 h before and after chABC treatment
    Genotype F(1,9) = 9.1 = 0.015 Crtl1 ko vs wt
Before chABC: F(1,9) = 18.9, p = 0.009;
After chABC: F <1, p = 0.751
    Delay F <1 = 0.410
    chABC F(1,9) = 2.1 = 0.179 Before vs after treatment
wt: F(1,9) = 5.7, p = 0.041;
Crtl1 ko: F <1, p = 0.664
    chABC × genotype F(1,9) = 4.3 = 0.043
    chABC × genotype × delay F <1 = 0.757