Table 2.
RE-AIM |
Numerator |
Denominator |
Reach, % | ||
Setting level | Eligible teams in IG | Randomized IG teams |
Individual level | Eligible athletes in IG | Athletes on randomized IG teams |
Representativeness | Eligible teams in IG | Teams playing at described competition levels (Flanders, Belgium) |
Effectiveness (injury incidence density and hazard ratio) | ||
Setting level | Difference in lower extremity injury risk per 1000 exposure hours between the IG and control group | |
Adoption, % | ||
Setting level | Teams approached that agreed to participate and implement the program | Eligible teams |
Implementation | ||
Setting level | Coaches who successfully implemented key program elements | Coaches of randomized IG teams |
Individual level | Program sessions followed by athletes of randomized IG teams | Program sessions that ideally needed to be followed by randomized IG teams |
Adherence | Program sessions followed by IG athletes who eventually implemented the program | Program sessions that ideally needed to be followed by IG teams that eventually implemented the program |
Maintenance | Proportion of coaches who planned to continue the intervention program in future seasons |
Abbreviations: IG, intervention group; RE-AIM, reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance.