Skip to main content
. 2013 May 16;7(5):e2189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002189

Table 2. Fecal egg count reduction of mebendazole for STHs assessed by pooled and individual samples.

Pool size Sample size at baseline/follow-up A. lumbricoides T. trichiura Hookworm
Mean FEC at baseline (EPG) FECR (%) p value Mean FEC at baseline (EPG) FECR (%) p value Mean FEC at baseline (EPG) FECR % p value
1 600/468 3,091 97.2 _ 320 60.9 43 44.2 _
10 60/48* 3,354 96.8 0.74 338 53.2 0.39 60 68.8 0.03
20 30/24** 4,965 96.8 0.80 607 77.7 0.62 67 65.6 0.26
60 10/8*** 4,020 96.1 0.24 305 57.7 0.44 50 87.5 0.02

At follow-up, pooling of exactly up to 10, 20, or 60 samples was not always possible:

*

pool10 includes: pools of 9 (n = 12) and pools of 10 (n = 36) samples;

**

pool20 includes: pools of 18 (n = 5), pools of 19 (n = 2) and pools of 20 (n = 17) samples; and*** pool60 includes: pools of 55 (n = 1), 56 (n = 1), 58 (n = 1) and 59 (n = 1) and pools of 60 (n = 4) samples.

EPG, eggs per gram of stool; FEC, fecal egg count; FECR, fecal egg count reduction.