Skip to main content
. 2013 May 1;3(5):815–825. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.005496

Table 2. Characterization of modifier alleles.

EP# Gene Insertion Site (position) Mutation C96-domR N Wings Scored C96-MamH N Wings Scored
425 tara Intron (12075314) LOF S (5%) 414 S+ 92
558 pabp2 Exon (4019484) LOF E (88%) 312 E 100
573 Lk6 Intron (7585856) LOF E (68%) 1023 S 206
593 Tudor-SN Upstream (264378) GOF E (74%) 426 ne 288
939 EcR Intron (2007989) LOF E (88%) 336 E 110
1000 lola Not Determined LOF E (91%) 251 E+ 100
1037 wdb Intron (23402526) GOF S (20%) 368 S+ 98
1202 atg1 Exon (12798085) LOF S (0%) 338 S+ 90
1538 lola Intron (6421948) LOF E (91%) 330 E+ 86
1561 emc Upstream (749363) GOF E (85%) 240 S+ 130
1630 lilli Intron (2900668) GOF E (81%) 378 E+ 194
1646 pum Intron (4983814) LOF E (70%) 250 E+ 130

The percentage of wing nicking is shown for crosses of C96-domR to EP modifiers in column labeled C96-domR. All wing nicking differences were highly significant (P < 0.001, chi-square test relative to w1118 control; 57%, Table 1). All EP tests included w1118 controls, and wing nicking percentages were normalized to 57% control value between experiments. EP 1000 was determined to be an allele of lola through a complementation test. The C96-MamH genotype produces 100% wing nicking when outcrossed to w1118 control. Among this control class we determined the percent of wings with weak, moderate, and strong effects including extent of nicks and blade loss. We then compared the distribution of severity in the EP cross progeny to determine if there was suppression (S), strong suppression (S+), enhancement (E), strong enhancement (E+) or no effect (ne); these data are presented in column labeled C96-MamH. GOF, gain of function; LOF, loss of function.