Table 3. Corroboration of EP insertion alleles.
| EP# | Corroborating Allele | C96-domR (% of Nicking) | N Wings Scored |
|---|---|---|---|
| 425 | tara1 | S (6%) | 300 |
| 558 | pabp201 | E (96%) | 361 |
| 573 | LK62 | E (95%) | 594 |
| 593 | P(EPg42)Tudor-SNEy07875 | E (79%) | 736 |
| 939 | EcRM554fs | E (81%) | 144 |
| 1000 | lolaORE119 | E (97%) | 114 |
| 1037 | UAS-Wdb | S (48%) | 620 |
| 1202 | unc513 (atg1) | S (36%) | 1126 |
| 1538 | lolaORE119 | E (97%) | 114 |
| 1561 | P{EPgy2}emcEY01657 | E (83%) | 262 |
| 1630 | P{EPgy2}lilliEY11976 | E (100%) | 283 |
| 1646 | 1(3)pum01688 | E (90%) | 392 |
The interaction between the corroborating allele for each EP and C96-domR is as described for Table 2. All wing nicking differences vs. w1118 control (57%) were highly significant (P < 0.001, chi-square test). For the GOF alleles EPs 1630, 1561, 593, and 1037, we corroborated with overexpression strains. E, enhancement; S, suppression.