Skip to main content
. 2013 May 17;8(5):e62831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062831

Table 6. QTLs detected on ‘Olivière’בArbequina’ integrated map.

BLUP Linkage Group LODa Var (%)b Allelic effectc Af c Am c Dc Cofactord
Tree Scale
Yield OA12 4.35 (2,5) 15.1 Am −0,7267 4,8602 −0,8794 Zit053
Yield_08 OA2 3.33 (3.4) 13.6 Af −3,0397 1,1436 1,1755 *ACG/CAC-59
OA6 2.39 (2.4) 9.6 Af;D 2,6439 −0,3025 −1,4886 Zit482
Yield_09 OA3 3,80 (3,0) 16.8 Af; Am 3,4688 1,1943 0,3547 Zit324
Yield_10 OA4 5.14 (3,1) 13.4 Af; D; Am 2,4808 −2,5112 −1,8372 *ACT/CAT-78
OA9 3.45 (2,8) 11.1 D 0,6723 −0,7503 −3,1309 *AGA/CTG-117
OA3 3.37 (2,9) 10.8 Am; D −0,9899 2,9788 1,2178 DCA3
Yield_11 OA25 4.50 (2,8) 20.2 Af; D; Am −5,284 4,008 −2,909 Zit388
GU Scale
Inflo_tot OA25 3,45 (2,6) 11.6 Am 0,0039 −0,0402 0,0156 Zit342
Inflotot_09 OA25 4.00 (2,8) 14.7 D 0,0370 −0,0324 0,1217 Zit342
OA3 3.27 (3,0) 12.1 Am 0,0335 0,1062 0,0231 Zit324
Inflotot_10 OA13 4.11 (3,4) 16.6 Am −0,0243 0,1241 0,0169 Zit376
Inflotot_11 OA1 6.26 (3,3) 18.0 Am; D −0,0045 −0,0605 0,0570 *AGA/CAA_142
OA7 5.06 (2,3) 14.3 Af; Am 0,0500 −0,0457 −0,0226 *ACT/CTT_197
Inflo_direct OA8 3,33 (3,0) 12,1 Am 0,0707 0,1156 0,0488 *ACT/CAC_142
Inflodirect_09 OA16 4.01 (3,2) 15 Af −0,1519 −0,0556 0,0482 *ACG/CTC-128
Inflodirect_10 OA3 3.70 (2,9) 13.9 Af; Am −0,0782 −0,0827 0,0421 *ACA/CAA-376
OA9 3.47 (2,7) 9.5 Af; D −0,0694 0,0097 −0,0609 *AGA/CTG-117
OA2 3.46 (3,2) 13.0 Af; D; Am −0,0446 −0,0651 −0,0784 *ACA/CAT-152
Inflodirect_11 OA1 4.47 (3,3) 15.0 Am; D 0,0151 −0,0471 0,0750 *AGA/CAA_142
OA9 3.64 (2,7) 12.0 Af 0,0800 −0,0139 −0,0223 *AGA/CTC-83
OA16 3.03 (3,0) 9.8 Af 0,0652 −0,0074 0,0151 *ACG/CTT-326
Fruit_direct OA20 3.12 (2,8) 13.1 Af; Am 0,1186 0,2819 −0,0169 *AGA/CTT_143
Fruitset_AS OA2 4.90 (3.3) 15.3 Af; D −0,2623 0,1104 −0,1618 *ACA/CTG-50
Inflo_M_09 OA2 3.48 (3,4) 13.2 Af; Am 0,2260 −0,1695 −0,0955 Zit105
Inflo_M_10 OA3 3.46 (2,9) 11.1 Am −0,0084 −0,1079 0,0145 Zit324
Inflo_M_11 OA20 3.71 (3,0) 13.3 Am 0,0360 0,0698 0,0342 *ACA/CTG_330
OA7 3.47 (2,3) 12.4 Af; D; Am 0,0366 −0,0387 −0,0519 Zit447
Inflo_S OA8 5.57 (2,9) 19.1 Af; D −0,0082 0,0013 0,0225 Zit394
OA10 4.19 (3,0) 14.1 Af 0,0202 0,0009 −0,0025 Zit402
OA9 2.64 (2.6) 8.4 Af; D −0,0088 0,0019 0,0140 *AGA/CTG-117
Inflo_S_09 OA20 4.61 (2,9) 12.9 Af; D −0,1697 −0,0416 −0,1447 Zit417
OA11 3.08 (3.0) 8.3 D 0,1014 0,0961 0,1415 Zit309
OA21 3.08 (3,1) 8.3 Am; D −0,0122 −0,1788 −0,0891 IAS_oli_11
Inflo_S_11 OA7 3.35 (2,4) 10.1 Am 0,0335 −0,1024 −0,0333 Zit447
a

Maximum LOD score value with the considered threshold in parentheses: Bold LOD score values are significant at genome wide threshold.

b

Percentage of phenotypic variation explained by the QTL.

c

Allelic effects were estimated as Af = [(µac+µad) − (µbc+µbd)]/4 for female additivity; Am =  [(µac+µbc)ad+µbd)]/4 for male additivity and D =  [(µac+µbd) − (µad+µbc)]/4 for dominance where µac, µad, µbc and µbd are estimated phenotypic means associated to each of the 4 possible genotypic classes ac, bc, ad and bd, deriving for an ab×cd cross.

d

markers used as cofactors in the MQM analysis: Bold cofactors are mapped on ‘Arbequina’ genetic map (male parent); Non Bold cofactors are mapped on ‘Olivière’ genetic map (female parent) and Italic cofactors are mapped on both parental maps.