Skip to main content
. 2013 May 17;8(5):e64448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064448

Table 2. Correlation among lifespan, biomass and viability at day 2 for the 15 media in the four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

WT sch9Δ tor1Δ sir2Δ
Lifespan Biomass Viability Lifespan Biomass Viability Lifespan Biomass Viability Lifespan Biomass Viability
Lifespan 0.40 0.38 0.18 0.40 0.37 0.30 0.39 0.37 0.52 0.37 0.37
WT Biomass 0.14 0.94 0.13 0.97 0.79 0.31 0.99 0.95 0.31 0.99 0.96
Viability 0.16 <.0001 –0.11 0.88 0.92 0.42 0.92 0.98 0.34 0.89 0.98
Lifespan 0.52 0.64 0.71 0.24 –0.26 –0.12 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.28 –0.01
sch9Δ Biomass 0.14 <.0001 <.0001 0.39 0.75 0.33 0.96 0.87 0.37 0.97 0.88
Viability 0.17 0.00 <.0001 0.35 0.00 0.47 0.77 0.90 0.42 0.72 0.86
Lifespan 0.28 0.26 0.12 0.67 0.23 0.08 0.23 0.37 0.87 0.27 0.37
tor1Δ Biomass 0.15 <.0001 <.0001 0.47 <.0001 0.00 0.40 0.94 0.26 0.99 0.95
Viability 0.18 <.0001 <.0001 0.99 <.0001 <.0001 0.18 <.0001 0.33 0.92 0.99
Lifespan 0.04 0.27 0.22 0.48 0.17 0.12 <.0001 0.35 0.23 0.30 0.31
sir2Δ Biomass 0.17 <.0001 <.0001 0.32 <.0001 0.00 0.32 <.0001 <.0001 0.28 0.93
Viability 0.17 <.0001 <.0001 0.98 <.0001 <.0001 0.17 <.0001 <.0001 0.27 <.0001

Pearson coefficient (r) is shown in top right of the table and corresponding P-value is shown in bottom left of the table.